Sluicing and the identity condition in EkeGusii

Robert Omari Otieno

Abstract


This paper proposes  a tri modular  approach of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic to sluice interpretation. Use of one level of language to analyse a syntactic construction can only capture what is syntactic, semantic or pragmatic. I wish to state that language levels act in tandem to produce meaning and aid in interpretation.   Data analysed has clearly demonstrated that one level of language cannot represent meaning of a sluiced construction. This also calls for readjustment of the definition of a sluice. Which will give theory  enough explanatory power to describe language operations.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barros, M. (2014 )Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD desertation. University of New Brunswick Rutgers.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chung, S. (2006). Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In BLS 31: General.

Chung, S. (2013). Syntactic identity in sluicing: Howmuch and why. Linguistic Inquiry.

Fiengo, R. & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge and Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Frege, G. (1918). “The thought”. Mind new series, Vol.65.

Merchant &, Jason (2001). The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.